Buyer's guide
Nobody can quote you a DPDP compliance price from a website, and any vendor who does is quoting a licence, not the cost of becoming compliant. What can be done honestly is to set out the variables that move the number, so you can size your own programme before you talk to anyone.
Two organisations of the same headcount can differ several-fold on all of these.
In most programmes the software licence is not the largest line. The larger costs are internal effort — legal time to establish lawful bases, engineering time to connect systems and to make deletion and withdrawal actually propagate, and the ongoing operational cost of answering requests inside statutory timelines.
This is why automation pays for itself unevenly. It compresses the recurring operational cost sharply and the one-off legal cost barely at all.
Answer four questions and you can brief a vendor properly, which is also how you stop being quoted an enterprise number for a mid-market problem.
ProtectComply implementation starts at INR 39,999 per year. That is a starting figure for a straightforward estate, not a quote: the variables above — system count and age, Significant Data Fiduciary status, request volume and processors in scope — are what move it, and we will give you a real number once we know them.
We publish the starting figure rather than hiding it because a buyer sizing a programme deserves to know the order of magnitude before booking a call. What we will not do is quote a final price without seeing your estate, because that number would be a guess.
ProtectComply implementation starts at INR 39,999 per year. What moves the figure is how many systems hold personal data and how old they are, whether you are a Significant Data Fiduciary, your volume of data principal requests, how many processors are in scope, and whether you already run an ISO 27001 or GDPR programme and are therefore buying a delta.
Usually not. Internal effort tends to be larger — legal time to establish lawful bases, engineering time to make deletion and consent withdrawal propagate, and the recurring cost of answering rights requests within statutory timelines.
It compresses the recurring operational cost substantially and the one-off legal cost barely at all, because determining lawful basis and SDF status are judgements software can record but not make.
Tarun Gupta — Chief Executive Officer. Tarun leads Exuverse, which builds ProtectComply. He works with Indian teams putting DPDP programmes into production and writes about what actually survives an audit.
Take the free readiness check and find out in 10 minutes.
Start free readiness check →