Buyer's guide
A data flow map answers a question the inventory cannot: not where personal data sits, but where it goes. Under the DPDP Act that matters because recipients, processors and any transfer outside India all have to be known — and the flows are what nobody documents.
A map that only shows systems is an architecture diagram. A DPDP map shows movement.
Maps built by asking system owners capture what people remember about systems they own. They miss undocumented integrations, exports built for a one-off analysis and left running, and anything added since the last cycle.
Because the exercise is expensive it runs annually, so the organisation spends most of the year relying on a document it knows is stale.
Three questions separate tooling from diagramming.
ProtectComply is built only for India's DPDP Act, so discovery, consent, rights, RoPA and breach workflows share one record and the evidence is a by-product of running the programme. Our security posture is SOC 2-aligned.
Where your requirement is genuinely broader than DPDP, a wider platform is the better buy.
Documenting where personal data moves — to which recipients, processors and sub-processors, and whether it leaves India — tied to the processing activity each flow serves.
The inventory says where personal data sits. The map says where it goes. You need both, and the map is the one that answers questions about recipients and cross-border transfer.
Because most are built by interviewing system owners once a year. That misses undocumented integrations and anything added since, so the map is stale for most of the period it covers.
Dinkar Singh — Dinkar covers privacy engineering at ProtectComply — discovery, consent propagation and the evidence trail behind them.
Take the free readiness check and find out in 10 minutes.
Start free readiness check →