A Data Fiduciary may process personal data of a Data Principal only in accordance with the provisions of this Act, and for a lawful purpose for which the Principal has given consent, or for certain legitimate uses set out in §7. There is no other lawful ground.
What this means in plain English
There are exactly two lawful bases: consent (§5-§6) or a §7 legitimate use.
Legitimate-interest, contract-necessity, and balancing tests from GDPR do NOT carry over.
Bundled or implicit consent fails §4 from the start.
If you cannot point to a specific consent record or a specific §7 ground per purpose, the processing is unlawful.
Penalty if you get this wrong
Unlawful processing exposes every downstream activity built on it. Failure-to-safeguard penalties up to ₹250 crore can stack onto unlawful-ground findings.
How ProtectComply solves it
Consent Management + Readiness Assessment
Per-purpose consent records pinned to the specific ground (§6 vs §7)
Readiness Assessment flags every processing activity without a declared lawful basis
RoPA entries require a lawful-basis field before they can be saved
AI gap analysis surfaces purposes drifting from their declared ground